Skip to main content
ClearValue Cards

Editorial Scoring Methodology

Every card on this site is scored on five dimensions, each worth 0–20 points, for a 100-point total. We publish the rubric so you can audit our judgment.

1. Effective rewards rate

The annualized cash-equivalent value per dollar spent, after redemption friction. Not the marketing rate. Travel points are normalized to our redemption-value benchmarks (1.5 cpp Chase UR, 1.4 cpp Amex MR, 1.0 cpp Capital One Miles default). Statement credits are prorated by realistic utilization.

2. Fee structure

Annual fee weighed against the value extracted at a realistic spend level for the target audience. $0 AF cards default high. A first-year fee waiver doesn't count — we score the renewal year.

3. Audience fit

How narrow and honest the audience the card serves. Cards that work brilliantly for a specific person (small business owner spending $50k+/yr, frequent flyer on one airline, credit-rebuilder) score higher than cards marketed broadly that serve no one well.

4. Transparency and trust

Clarity of the issuer's Schumer Box disclosures, devaluation history, CFPB complaint volume per 100k holders, hidden friction. Issuers that retroactively devalued points or buried intro-rate gotchas are penalized.

5. Honest weakness named

Does our review name the tradeoff honestly? A review with no "where it falls short" section caps at 10. A review that surfaces 2-3 real weaknesses and names who shouldn't apply earns full credit. This dimension is the anti-hype gate — even a great card scores low here if our review hyped it.

Verdict ladder

ScoreVerdictWhat it means
90–100CanonReview-of-record for this card type
80–89Solid pickRecommended for the named audience
70–79Worth consideringDepends on specifics
60–69Niche / conditionalWorks for X but most readers should look elsewhere
<60SkipBetter alternatives exist; review explains why

What we don’t do